About your Search

20130416
20130424
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
? is there facial recognition technology? or do they have to rely on people saying i know that guy? >> there is facial recognition technology, but to tell you the truth, honestly, when i was in a little kid i met a hero detective who solved a very tough case involving a sniper and i said how did you do it? and he wrote something that i can't repeat on the air, but it was basically knock on doors and get off of your derriere. facial recognition can only take you so far. i think it will be a member of the public. the reporting has been extraordinary, i think cnn, you guys, fox and msnbc have really done a very good job. and part of that is getting evidence in there that they think is important but when strung together it will come together, but is a very human intensive process. all of the photographs and video, really have to go through a set of eyes not a computer. >> michael: yeah, and that's amazing, and of course that's why we had you on brian, to talk about exactly how good of job we have done covering this story. but we really appreciate your input, beca
something amazing. i want to play a124 guys here. >> i've never argued against technology being used when you have an eminent threat, an active crime going on. if someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and $50 in cash, i don't care if a drone kills him or a policeman kills him, but it's different if they want to come fly over your hot tub or yard just because they want to do surveillance on everyone and they want to watch your activities. cenk: all right, that's it, i officially withdraw all of my support on that issue from and powell. mark that's what they use drones for. >> if they're flying over your hot tub on the way to the liquor store to get the guy they're doing two things at one time. i don't see the upside of this whole drone situation. i mean, it's crazy. it's the abridgment of more civil rights which we've seen in this country on the war on terror now with a grandness that you can't contain. you can't roll this stuff back. i think it's really of great great concern here. cenk: i totally agree with you. leslie, let me go to you on that. it almost seems rand paul is s
to have posted a video, to his youtube page. you have been mentioned the way technology has been playing, it sounds like as we speak this other suspect there is a twitter account -- >> we don't know sfitif it is fake or not. >> stephanie: right. but he keeps repeating that he is going to kill the police that are supposedly surrounding the house, correct? >> yes, and that is coming from police scanners. at least police there are talking about the surviving brother claiming that he is going to kill as many police as possible and taunting them online. there is a report from nbc that where police have this remaining brother apparently surrounded, or they think they have him surrounded, there are also two devices that are outside this building that have given police some pause, and they look somewhat similar to the devices used in the boston marathon bombings, and perhaps were thrown at police last night. so part of what is causing police to slow downis not just the hostage situation, but also possibly having to disarm or disabled these devices. >> stephanie: yes, and
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)